Girls Just Wanna Have FunDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS

We don't hate men.
We hate misogyny.

This journal is gay/lesbian, bisexual, pansexual, transgender, intersex, genderqueer, asexual, queer/questioning positive

“White sexual imperialism, through rape and war, created the hyper-sexualized stereotype of the Asian woman. This stereotype in turn fostered the over-prevalence of Asian women in pornography, the mail-order bride phenomenon, the Asian fetish syndrome, and worst of all, sexual violence against Asian women.”

janedoe225:

Sexual Colonialism and the Creation of the Asian Mystique

(Source: comradeclaudia, via thenewwomensmovement)

http://futureabortiondoctor.tumblr.com/post/92668180311/thisisableism-celestia-thisisableism

thisisableism:

celestia:

thisisableism:

celestia:

actual-blank-flank:

"bihet" is 2000% unacceptable i don’t care what your reasoning is

i really wanna know why

why wouldn’t it be? It literally means “bisexual heterosexual”.

It’s a phrase that’s meant to…

(Source: princess-bilight-sparkle)

pan-tastic:

Just gonna throw it out there- “feminazis” aren’t real. Stop equating genocide to that one time a girl told you to stop being a sexist piece of shit. 

(via prettytyrells)

http://elaphaia.tumblr.com/post/92643778887/weteyeswethair-wabbajerk-atomicdomme-a

weteyeswethair:

wabbajerk:

atomicdomme:

a lot of people talk like capitalism is necessary to have innovation and I just think of all the brilliant and creative people I know who spend all of their time and energy worrying about how they’re going to have a roof over their heads and…

"

Not all women are the owners of a uterus, and not all owners of a uterus are women. A transgender man—that is, a man who was assigned female at birth—may very well have a uterus, may become pregnant, and may very well need the same access to reproductive health options as your average cisgender woman. The same can be said for non-binary individuals who were assigned female at birth. As people who don’t identify as a woman or a man (though they may identify themselves as both, neither, or a combination of the two), some may feel that this language erases their identity or leaves them out. Yes, these people may have a uterus—but it’s not a “lady part.”

While there’s little doubt that women make up the largest segment of uterus-owning individuals, this name further ostracizes oft-overlooked members of society like trans men and non-binary individuals who were assigned female at birth. To exclude them in this, an organization aimed at educating the public on the issue of reproductive health, would seem to negate the organization’s stated goals by erasing identities and perpetuating the already stressful and exclusionary culture these individuals are forced to inhabit.

"

The Trouble With “Lady Parts” | Parker Marie Molloy for Slate (via gaywrites)

(via becauseiamawoman)

"

It reminds me of the “bike to work” movement. That is also portrayed as white, but in my city more than half of the people on bike are not white. I was once talking to a white activist who was photographing “bike commuters” and had only pictures of white people with the occasional “Black professional” I asked her why she didn’t photograph the delivery people, construction workers etc. … ie. the Black and [Latin@] and Asian people… and she mumbled something about trying to “improve the image of biking” then admitted that she didn’t really see them as part of the “green movement” since they “probably have no choice” –

I was so mad I wanted to quit working on the project she and I were collaborating on.

So, in the same way when people in a poor neighborhood grow food in their yards … it’s just being poor– but when white people do it they are saving the earth or something.

"

comment left on the Racialious blog post “Sustainable Food & Privilege: Why is Green always White (and Male and Upper-Class)” (via meggannn)

(Source: trilliswheatley, via mediocre-satan)